CV, LinkedIn, interview, follow-up. Four doors. Each one feeds the next. CoVentry gives you the kind of feedback you would get from a senior at McKinsey, Goldman or Google — without having to know one.
Career Services exists, but it doesn't scale. One person on the team can't review 4,000 CVs or simulate 4,000 interviews a year. So most students walk into their first interview without ever having practiced, without a CV reviewed by anyone with judgment, and without knowing what the recruiter on the other side is actually looking for.
feel unprepared to look for their first job, according to the Career Services Benchmark Europe.
is what most receive before their first real interview. Preparation gets improvised the night before.
It's not a collection of tools. It's a flow. What CoVentry learns about your CV gets used to generate your interview questions. What it sees in the job posting gets used to write your follow-up. ChatGPT forgets. CoVentry remembers.
PDF, Word or image. Text extraction without a vision model — 84% cheaper, same quality. It reads it the way a senior recruiter would: structure, clarity, metrics, gaps. Returns three scores (clarity, impact, ATS compatibility) and an overall one. Plus concrete recommendations: not "add more skills" but "your Bloomberg experience isn't quantified — add an output".
CoVentry analyses your profile: headline, experience, skills, summary. It identifies what's stopping recruiters from finding you and what needs rewriting so LinkedIn's algorithm ranks you higher. Not aesthetics — visibility strategy.
URL or text. Any role at any company. CoVentry compares your CV to the exact requirements: which keywords are there, which are missing, your real probability of passing the ATS filter. It won't tell you to lie. If you don't have the skill, it won't suggest adding it.
Seven questions generated for that specific posting. If your CV mentions Bloomberg, it asks about Bloomberg. If the company is McKinsey, it's cases. If it's Goldman, it's calculations. Each question comes with a hint, a time estimate, and a model answer at the level of a top candidate. You answer in text. CoVentry grades each one the way a senior would — no condescension.
Personalized post-interview email. References something concrete from the CV or the conversation, reaffirms interest with a specific reason, no clichés, ready to send. In six languages. Professional but human.
ChatGPT gives you a plausible answer. CoVentry gives you the answer someone who has read 10,000 CVs and run 500 interviews in your sector would give you. The difference shows up when feedback is actionable, not generic.
Every analysis uses criteria specific to sector, market and seniority. Banking isn't consulting. Junior isn't senior. Spain isn't the UK. We know it and reflect it.
What CoVentry learns in step 1 gets used in step 4. ChatGPT starts from scratch every time you open a tab. CoVentry remembers your CV when generating your questions and your follow-up.
The prompts explicitly instruct the model not to be nice for niceness' sake. If your CV isn't ready, it tells you. If your answer was weak, it tells you. Flattery doesn't land jobs.
Questions are generated by reading the actual job posting. The ATS match compares against the exact requirements of the role. Goldman asks differently from Google. We treat it that way.
Premium access for all your students, fixed annual price, aggregated adoption reports for Career Services. No variable cost, no surprises, no need to hire more people.
I knew exactly what to change in my CV to apply for consulting. I had never gotten such concrete feedback.
The questions it generated were essentially the ones I got in the real interview. I came prepared and it showed from the first answer.
I applied the LinkedIn changes on a Monday. By Friday two recruiters had reached out. I didn't expect it to work that fast.